Quote:
Originally Posted by Simeon90
Er, no, Alfa is a luxury car brand, the only thing you could possibly liken to Fiat is reliability, and the OP clearly has the tools and knowledge for that, as I was pointing out.
Yes I've had problems, but they're fixed, and now I have the car as Volvo intended I think it's a bit crap frankly for what is a £35k ? car new, XC60s are pretty cramped inside and I unfortunately don't find it particularly comfortable on long journeys, maybe I would have been better off with R-design seats, but never drove one. However, car in question is a V60, possibly a lot nicer, but I never drove one because the boot is too small for an estate.
|
I didn't know Alfa was a luxury brand. I don't see many of them, not compared to Merc's, BMW's, Audi's and so on. Being honest, I think a Mercedes or Jaguar is far more luxurious than an Alfa. I don't put Alfa in the luxury league, but hey... That's just my opinion. No offence to anyone that owns one.
What you experienced with your car is a design flaw, a bad one at that. Volvo aren't alone in that world though. There's other manufacturers that have major issues too. Its not right in a 35k car, but it happens. No car is perfect. Its good that its sorted though.
I never understood why people think the XC60 would be roomy in the first place anyway,. Its a mid-sized SUV, being honest, its on the small end of "mid size". Just look at it... you can see as clear as day that its not going to be spacious. If you want a spacious SUV Volvo with plenty of room, go for an XC90. The XC60 is a baby in comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gianmarko
Hi Kev, thanks for the informations.
a couple words about alfas...
alfas are fiat but they are not "fiat". fiats are the cheap line and alfa is the luxury line and alfas are built to a completely different standard.
i had 4 and they all had a fantastic reliability record. i scrapped the 156 at 360k km, my first 159 at 300k, my current 159 has 200k and still going strong, and my wife Giulietta is at 210k km and works like clockwork.of course they are older and cheaper cars than a 2018 V60 (my 159 is 2009) but build quality is excellent. all alfas i scrapped is because of a detonated alternator, replacing which would have costed thousands.
One of the reasons i dont get another Alfa is that they do not make a car that fits my needs and at this stage i need an autobox, decently powered diesel station wagon and market is quite narrow there.
now enough alfa on a volvo forum
the V60 i test drove had the smoothest autobox i have ever driven so it should be ok there. roger for the gearbox fluid. as changes are very few high price of fluid is not an issue. i plan getting vdash, i always prefer to take a look myself at diagnostics because often garages dont understand them correctly and start randomly replacing parts.
inspecting the car i looked at the belts and they look good. no oil leaks either (that would get the car bounced at the MOT and car will be delivered freshly MOTed, pretty standard practice here, and MOT is a serious business so a guarantee car is ok.
i suspected spares will be more expensive than for fiat, but i hope i will need few (needed very very few for my alfas, mostly brake parts and other consumables.)
i think i will get this car. it ticks all the boxes except perhaps price (at 21k euro is a bit pricier than similar ones on the market here) but other V60 on the market are at 2 or more hours drive.
i see this car is supposed to burn 5.7lt/100km which is surprisingly low, is that a realistic number? with my current ride i average 7lt and is a manual FWD
|
That equates to around 49 miles per gallon... On a longer journey driving on motorway/faster roads, that's achievable. Around town doing short trips, I think it would be much lower than that.
A detonated alternator would cost thousands to repair? Did the belt snap, causing the timing belt to fail too?